The Perils of bypassing Russia ? 'Turkmenistan Takes Sides in Pipeline Supply Competition'

While Russia has stated that its state-owned gas giant Gazprom would participate in a trans-Afghan pipeline with Turkmenistan, Turkmen officials have denied the same. This comes after a rather disappointing meeting in Ashgabat between Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and his Turkmen counterpart Gurbanguly Berdymukhamedov, in which Moscow came away empty handed.

 

Analytical Note: Turkmenistan has played coy with Russia, with the Turkmen president issuing a very general and vague statement during Medvedev's visit: "Russian and Turkmenistan have mutual interest in partnership development. Our relationship is noted for stability and mutual understanding on fundamental issues."

 

That, however, does not mean a new deal with Gazprom, and responding to Russia's statement to that effect, the Turkmen Foreign Ministry said: "Turkmenistan will continue to raise the significance of Europe-bound projects in its energy policy and will independently choose partners." Furthermore, the statement read: "Turkmenistan views the published remarks as an attempt to interfere in the normal course of international energy relations."

 

The misunderstanding revolves around two main competing pipelines: the European-backed Nabucco pipeline and the Russian-backed South Stream pipeline, both vying for Turkmen gas.

 

Recently, the Nabucco pipeline consortium announced that it would seek to be supplied by natural gas from Iraq, Azerbaijan, and Turkmenistan, which would be transported through Turkey, bypassing Russia. Russian officials responded to this announcement by saying that Russia's Nord Stream and South Stream pipelines would be operational before Nabucco, and hence particularly Azeri and Turkmen gas supplies would it first, rendering Nabucco redundant. 

 

"Given the estimates of the Turkmen side, as well as European and international experts, the current market situation on the gas track allows us to say - and I say so without sarcasm - that there are no prospects for Nabucco," Russia's RIA Novosti quoted the Russian deputy prime minister as saying.

 

It appears, however, that Turkmenistan sees things differently, and the statement from its Foreign Ministry clearly backs supplying the Nabucco pipeline.

 

By. Jen Alic of the Global Intelligence Report

 

Source: http://www.globalintelligencereport.com/categories/Professional-Level-1

 

The global Intelligence Report is a Private news & Intelligence service for sophisticated news consumers, investors and energy market participants. To find out more please visit: http://www.globalintelligencereport.com/categories/Professional-Level-1

 

 

 

 

 

 

RBS Employee 'Blows whistle on Upcoming Layoff and Lame Management'

http://read.bi/cjLEhp

______________________
News brought to you By: investorseurope 745 Europort Gibraltar GX11 1AA T  +350 200 40303 F  +350 200 51795  www.twitter.com/mt4offshore
Forex Brokerage : http://bit.ly/11zOCb DEMO : http://bit.ly/aH8o80 Stock Brokerage : http://bit.ly/6QycRq   DEMO :http://bit.ly/cRLSbs Futures Broker   : http://bit.ly/pQxYq      DEMO : http://bit.ly/9hRCsK
Investors Europe Limited is a Gibraltar incorporated, MiFID complian t stock broker regulated by the Financial Services Commission at the Pillars of Hercules. www.investorseurope.com/pillars_of_hercules.html Read our disclaimers on spot forex, the diffusion of third party products news, services and U.S. Persons http://bit.ly/ieldisclaimer
Chat
Skype
Skype: investorseurope
Contact Me

Titanium Resources Group: Dredge D2 Insurance Update

http://boullevortal.com/cgi-bin/news.cgi?rm=display&articleID=1254736629

Unknownname

Dredge D2 Insurance Update

5 October 2009: Titanium Resources Group Ltd (“TRG” or “the Company”) announces an update with regard to TRG and its subsidiary Sierra Rutile Limited’s (“SRL”) legal action against insurers over its outstanding claims relating to the capsize of Dredge D2.

 

SRL’s legal action is continuing and has recently been set down for a 4 week trial commencing on 28 June 2010 in the Commercial Court, a division of the High Court in London.  On the current timetable, trial would therefore be completed by 23 July 2010, with judgment likely to be reserved at the end of the hearing and handed down at the Court's convenience thereafter. 

 

The Court has directed the parties (as part of the pre-trial timetable) to seek to resolve their disputes by mediation, a structured without prejudice settlement discussion, such mediation to take place before 29 January 2010.

 

One of the main reinsurers has already settled its share of the claim. 

ENDS

For further information: 

Titanium Resources Limited

John Sisay, Chief Executive 

Walter Kansteiner, Non-executive Chairman 

Tel: +44 (0) 207 321 0000 

Arbuthnot Securities 

Nominated Adviser & Broker

John Prior 

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7012 2000

Aura Financial

Michael Oke / Andy Mills

Tel: +44 (0) 207 321 0000 

STOCKS NEWS UK- Petra up on 507 carat diamond find

Petra Diamonds rises more than 7 percent after the AIM-listed miner announces the recovery of a 507 carat white diamond,

 

Investors Europe stockbrokers Gibraltar NEWS, Global Research 'How the Federal Reserve Contributes to Crises'

Investors Europe Stock Brokers, Gibraltar NEWS: Exchanges warn G20 of dangers in 'dark pools'

http://link.ft.com/r/NA70KK/TS11Q/W8MA9/TJJDP/2LI9W/D5/t Exchanges warn G20 of dangers in 'dark pools'
The world's stock and derivatives exchanges warned the Group of 20 leaders that the continued 'proper functioning' of their markets could not be taken for granted because of a proliferation of alternative trading venues such as 'dark pools' Read more >>

Investors Europe Stock Brokers Gibraltar NEWS: BHP Billiton News FY2009 Reports

Offshore Stock Brokers, US Clients trade here online

http://investorseurope.posterous.com/offshore-stock-brokers-us-clients-here-trade
Offshore Stock Brokers, US Clients here trade online FOREX ...
Filed under. boulle · gates of Hercules · gibraltar · investors europe
· offshore stock brokers · online stockbrokers · online trading ·
online trading online trading platforms · online trading portal · portals
of hercules ...
Investors Europe
<http://investorseurope.posterous.com/>

Offshore Stock Brokers, US Clients here trade online FOREX ...
By onlinetradingplatforms
Offshore Stock Brokers, US Clients here trade online FOREX, Futures, ETFs,
Stocks and CFDs. By onlinetradingplatforms. Offshore Stock Brokers, The
Americas #1 Offshore Stock Brokers of choice. via offshorestockbrokers.com
...
<http://onlinetradingplatforms.wordpress.com/2009/09/20/offshore-stock-brokers-us-clients-here-trade-online-forex-futures-etfs-stocks-and-cfds/>
Online Trading Platforms Blog
<http://onlinetradingplatforms.wordpress.com/>


Offshore Stock Brokers Offshore Stock Brokers US Clients here ...
Offshore Stock Brokers. For the world's largest selection of online ...
Offshore Stock Brokers US Clients here trade online FOREX Futures ETFs
Stocks and ...
<http://offshorestockbrokers.blogspot.com/2009/09/offshore-stock-brokers-us-clients-here.html>

Pierre Bertrand Boulle
investorseurope
745 Europort
Gibraltar
T +350 200 40303
F +350 200 51795

Will Fat Cat FSA do anything about this?

Regulatory Arbitrage, the Latest Edition 2 comments

by: The Baseline Scenario September 18, 2009 | about: BCS    

The Baseline Scenario


About this author:
back to yahoo finance http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http://seekingalpha.com/sector/financial.xml" style="display: none;">add to my yahoo back to cake

By James Kwak

Gillian Tett has the latest perspective on a curious deal that Barclays (BCS) did earlier this week (hat tip Brad DeLong). The deal goes something like this. Two former Barclays execs are starting a fund called Protium Finance. Protium has two equity investors who are putting in $450 million. Barclays is lending Protium $12.6 billion. Protium is using the cash to buy $12.3 billion in what we used to call toxic assets from Barclays. Protium’s 45 staff members get a management fee of $40 million per year (presumably from the equity investors, although that seems steep). Returns from the investments will be paid as follows, in this order (and this is important): (1) fund management fees; (2) a guaranteed 7% return to investors; (3) repayment of the Barclays loan; and (4) residual cash flows to the investors.

Barclays emphasized that it was not participating in regulatory arbitrage, because it is keeping the toxic assets on its balance sheet for regulatory purposes. That is, because it has a lot of exposure to those assets through its huge loan, it will continue to hold capital against those assets. So far so good.

But regulatory capital arbitrage is only one kind of arbitrage. For ordinary accounting purposes, the toxic assets are not on its balance sheet. So if they fall in value, Barclays will not have to recognize a loss – at least not until Protium defaults on its loan, which could be as far as ten years in the future. So the bank has the same true economic exposure, but can pretend it isn’t there for a long time.

Or does it have the same true economic exposure? If things go badly, yes, since Protium will default on the loan. If things go well, however, Protium’s investors get all the upside since they get the residual cash flows after the loan is paid off. So Barclays is left with all the downside and none of the upside. In return for giving away the upside, they should have gotten a good interest rate on the loan. The interest rate is LIBOR + 275 bp, and I have no way of calculating if that’s a good rate or not. But even assuming it is a good interest rate, this is what Nassim Taleb calls a nickels strategy – picking up nickels (the nice interest rate) in front of a steamroller (the risk of the assets falling in value).

Finally, we have the other kind of arbitrage. Although Barclays is recognizing its exposure to Protium, Protium is a different company, and it’s not a bank. That’s important these days, and this is Tett’s main point. In particular, because it’s not a bank, British regulators can’t do anything to it. In particular, they can’t prevent Protium from paying its managers whatever they want to pay it, and they probably can’t force Protium to even tell them what its managers are making.

So here we have the ultimate form of regulatory arbitrage. If you’re a bank exec worried about public exposure or, even worse, regulation of your compensation, go create a new special-purpose vehicle to manage bank assets, entice the equity investors in with a sweetheart deal, and pay yourself whatever you want. Given the size of Barclays, the shareholders won’t notice $40 million here or there, especially if it looks like it’s coming from someone else. Everyone wins.

Print this article with comments

This article has 2 comments:

  •  

    what happens if they default tomorrow?
    Sep 18 02:30 PM |Report abuse | Link | Reply
    0 0
  •  

  • Investors Europe
  • |
  • Investors Europe
  • Incorrect. Regulatory Authority and Regulatory transparency lose A.K.A "The Law". Will Fat Cat FSA do anything about it? Doubt it..

    Fed Shoots a Regulatory Shot... But it's Just a Blank

    Friday, September 18, 2009


    I have no idea what this is from
    but somehow it is appropriate.
    Thank you again, Google image search.

    Tools? We have tons of them. Don't call the Fed impotent, you pricks, they have plenty of tools at their disposal even though ZIRP looks likely to stick around for quite some time.

    Oooh. Regulation and the Fed. Two of my favorite subjects in one delicious package of FAIL. I'm getting excited.

    Someone give them some porn mags.

    WaPo (who should be on JDA Watch right now for covering that ridiculous "racism" bullshit but I'll give them a pass because I have other things on my mind and can't entirely focus on this ridiculousness much longer):

    The Federal Reserve is moving to restrict compensation practices at the nation's banks, expanding its regulatory reach to oversee how tens of thousands of bank employees ranging from chief executives to loan officers are paid.

    The Fed, acting under its existing powers as a bank regulator, aims to curtail pay practices that can encourage bank employees to take the kinds of irresponsible risks that may have led to the financial crisis. It is not seeking to set caps on the amount any individual employee can be paid, said sources familiar with the plans.

    Fed officials and many private analysts have concluded that pay practices emphasizing short-term performance contributed to the near-collapse of the financial system last year.

    For example, a trader who receives bonuses based solely on one year's performance might make bets that pay off in the short run but cause vast losses in the long run. A loan officer paid only based on the volume of loans issued might not pay enough attention to the quality of those loans. Under the approach envisioned by the Fed, the two dozen or so largest banks would have to explain these pay practices to their regulator, and adjust them if examiners think they endanger the safety and soundness of the bank, said the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the policy is not yet final.

    Some critics viewed the expected new regulations as a form of mission creep by the central bank, as it is being undertaken without explicit authorization from Congress. It comes as the Fed is facing extreme political pressure, under fire for its efforts to stabilize the financial system and for regulatory failures in the years before the crisis -- and as Chairman Ben S. Bernanke is up for Senate confirmation for a second term.