Investors Europe Stock Brokers: strategy runner fx online... strategy

<http://investorseurope.posterous.com/?page=5>
Investors Europe - The Global Portal for Online Trading Platforms ...
Investors Europe Stock Brokers: strategy runner fx offshore ... strategy
runner: trade forex fx offshore with strategy runner at ...
<http://investorseurope.posterous.com/?page=5>

Pierre Bertrand Boulle
investorseurope
745 Europort
Gibraltar
T +350 200 40303
F +350 200 51795

NEWS: World Economic Recovery to Overwhelm Supply of Metals and Minerals?

STOCKS NEWS UK- Petra up on 507 carat diamond find

Petra Diamonds rises more than 7 percent after the AIM-listed miner announces the recovery of a 507 carat white diamond,

 

Investors Europe stockbrokers Gibraltar NEWS, Global Research 'How the Federal Reserve Contributes to Crises'

Investors Europe Stock Brokers, Gibraltar NEWS: Exchanges warn G20 of dangers in 'dark pools'

http://link.ft.com/r/NA70KK/TS11Q/W8MA9/TJJDP/2LI9W/D5/t Exchanges warn G20 of dangers in 'dark pools'
The world's stock and derivatives exchanges warned the Group of 20 leaders that the continued 'proper functioning' of their markets could not be taken for granted because of a proliferation of alternative trading venues such as 'dark pools' Read more >>

Offshore Stock Brokers, US Clients trade here online

http://investorseurope.posterous.com/offshore-stock-brokers-us-clients-here-trade
Offshore Stock Brokers, US Clients here trade online FOREX ...
Filed under. boulle · gates of Hercules · gibraltar · investors europe
· offshore stock brokers · online stockbrokers · online trading ·
online trading online trading platforms · online trading portal · portals
of hercules ...
Investors Europe
<http://investorseurope.posterous.com/>

Offshore Stock Brokers, US Clients here trade online FOREX ...
By onlinetradingplatforms
Offshore Stock Brokers, US Clients here trade online FOREX, Futures, ETFs,
Stocks and CFDs. By onlinetradingplatforms. Offshore Stock Brokers, The
Americas #1 Offshore Stock Brokers of choice. via offshorestockbrokers.com
...
<http://onlinetradingplatforms.wordpress.com/2009/09/20/offshore-stock-brokers-us-clients-here-trade-online-forex-futures-etfs-stocks-and-cfds/>
Online Trading Platforms Blog
<http://onlinetradingplatforms.wordpress.com/>


Offshore Stock Brokers Offshore Stock Brokers US Clients here ...
Offshore Stock Brokers. For the world's largest selection of online ...
Offshore Stock Brokers US Clients here trade online FOREX Futures ETFs
Stocks and ...
<http://offshorestockbrokers.blogspot.com/2009/09/offshore-stock-brokers-us-clients-here.html>

Pierre Bertrand Boulle
investorseurope
745 Europort
Gibraltar
T +350 200 40303
F +350 200 51795

Will Fat Cat FSA do anything about this?

Regulatory Arbitrage, the Latest Edition 2 comments

by: The Baseline Scenario September 18, 2009 | about: BCS    

The Baseline Scenario


About this author:
back to yahoo finance http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http://seekingalpha.com/sector/financial.xml" style="display: none;">add to my yahoo back to cake

By James Kwak

Gillian Tett has the latest perspective on a curious deal that Barclays (BCS) did earlier this week (hat tip Brad DeLong). The deal goes something like this. Two former Barclays execs are starting a fund called Protium Finance. Protium has two equity investors who are putting in $450 million. Barclays is lending Protium $12.6 billion. Protium is using the cash to buy $12.3 billion in what we used to call toxic assets from Barclays. Protium’s 45 staff members get a management fee of $40 million per year (presumably from the equity investors, although that seems steep). Returns from the investments will be paid as follows, in this order (and this is important): (1) fund management fees; (2) a guaranteed 7% return to investors; (3) repayment of the Barclays loan; and (4) residual cash flows to the investors.

Barclays emphasized that it was not participating in regulatory arbitrage, because it is keeping the toxic assets on its balance sheet for regulatory purposes. That is, because it has a lot of exposure to those assets through its huge loan, it will continue to hold capital against those assets. So far so good.

But regulatory capital arbitrage is only one kind of arbitrage. For ordinary accounting purposes, the toxic assets are not on its balance sheet. So if they fall in value, Barclays will not have to recognize a loss – at least not until Protium defaults on its loan, which could be as far as ten years in the future. So the bank has the same true economic exposure, but can pretend it isn’t there for a long time.

Or does it have the same true economic exposure? If things go badly, yes, since Protium will default on the loan. If things go well, however, Protium’s investors get all the upside since they get the residual cash flows after the loan is paid off. So Barclays is left with all the downside and none of the upside. In return for giving away the upside, they should have gotten a good interest rate on the loan. The interest rate is LIBOR + 275 bp, and I have no way of calculating if that’s a good rate or not. But even assuming it is a good interest rate, this is what Nassim Taleb calls a nickels strategy – picking up nickels (the nice interest rate) in front of a steamroller (the risk of the assets falling in value).

Finally, we have the other kind of arbitrage. Although Barclays is recognizing its exposure to Protium, Protium is a different company, and it’s not a bank. That’s important these days, and this is Tett’s main point. In particular, because it’s not a bank, British regulators can’t do anything to it. In particular, they can’t prevent Protium from paying its managers whatever they want to pay it, and they probably can’t force Protium to even tell them what its managers are making.

So here we have the ultimate form of regulatory arbitrage. If you’re a bank exec worried about public exposure or, even worse, regulation of your compensation, go create a new special-purpose vehicle to manage bank assets, entice the equity investors in with a sweetheart deal, and pay yourself whatever you want. Given the size of Barclays, the shareholders won’t notice $40 million here or there, especially if it looks like it’s coming from someone else. Everyone wins.

Print this article with comments

This article has 2 comments:

  •  

    what happens if they default tomorrow?
    Sep 18 02:30 PM |Report abuse | Link | Reply
    0 0
  •  

  • Investors Europe
  • |
  • Investors Europe
  • Incorrect. Regulatory Authority and Regulatory transparency lose A.K.A "The Law". Will Fat Cat FSA do anything about it? Doubt it..

    Fed Shoots a Regulatory Shot... But it's Just a Blank

    Friday, September 18, 2009


    I have no idea what this is from
    but somehow it is appropriate.
    Thank you again, Google image search.

    Tools? We have tons of them. Don't call the Fed impotent, you pricks, they have plenty of tools at their disposal even though ZIRP looks likely to stick around for quite some time.

    Oooh. Regulation and the Fed. Two of my favorite subjects in one delicious package of FAIL. I'm getting excited.

    Someone give them some porn mags.

    WaPo (who should be on JDA Watch right now for covering that ridiculous "racism" bullshit but I'll give them a pass because I have other things on my mind and can't entirely focus on this ridiculousness much longer):

    The Federal Reserve is moving to restrict compensation practices at the nation's banks, expanding its regulatory reach to oversee how tens of thousands of bank employees ranging from chief executives to loan officers are paid.

    The Fed, acting under its existing powers as a bank regulator, aims to curtail pay practices that can encourage bank employees to take the kinds of irresponsible risks that may have led to the financial crisis. It is not seeking to set caps on the amount any individual employee can be paid, said sources familiar with the plans.

    Fed officials and many private analysts have concluded that pay practices emphasizing short-term performance contributed to the near-collapse of the financial system last year.

    For example, a trader who receives bonuses based solely on one year's performance might make bets that pay off in the short run but cause vast losses in the long run. A loan officer paid only based on the volume of loans issued might not pay enough attention to the quality of those loans. Under the approach envisioned by the Fed, the two dozen or so largest banks would have to explain these pay practices to their regulator, and adjust them if examiners think they endanger the safety and soundness of the bank, said the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the policy is not yet final.

    Some critics viewed the expected new regulations as a form of mission creep by the central bank, as it is being undertaken without explicit authorization from Congress. It comes as the Fed is facing extreme political pressure, under fire for its efforts to stabilize the financial system and for regulatory failures in the years before the crisis -- and as Chairman Ben S. Bernanke is up for Senate confirmation for a second term.

    Offshore Stock Brokers, US Clients here trade online FOREX, Futures, ETFs, Stocks and CFDs

    Pimp my regulator

    Pimp my regulator: Alan Lakey

    By Industry commentator

    It is a relatively effortless exercise taking pot shots at the FSA.

    Moreover, as the process is wonderfully cathartic, it can easily transform into the drug of choice providing a euphoria that, no matter how temporary, helps drag befuddled minds through the remnants of their working day.

    Of course, the FSA frequently sets itself up for abuse and embarrassments, and in most instances those hecklers are performing a worthwhile function by pointing out (and it matters not how cruelly barbed these jibes are) the various legal, ethical and logical vacuums in regulatory thinking.

    But how would practitioners design their very own regulator if given a malleable template and a £324m budget?

    Some things immediately spring to mind, such as taking an axe to the unreadable and un-navigable rule book and similarly confusing website.

    Likewise, all advisers gasp at the sheer cost of the regime and this is one occasion where an influx of Oxera consultants would be welcomed. Paintings and statues can be sold and taxi rides banned - public transport is perfectly acceptable for all but the direst emergency.

    Salaries should be commensurate with competing public sector quangos.

    The argument that pay levels must be sufficiently high to attract good quality staff is invalidated by the reality that previous director’s on £300,000 p.a. upwards, were not up to the task and were dispensed with after receiving the obligatory golden parachute.

    Hector Sants receives £478,000 p.a. and this ignores the £145,000 cost of pension contribution, limousine, driver and other perks valued at an additional £145,100.

    Clive Briault commanded a £300,000 salary, bonus of £30,000 and other emoluments exceeding £24,000 in his final year and, additionally, received in excess of £326,000 for his misfortune in being sacrificed over the Northern Rock affair.

    Compare this with the £230,000 paid to the Lord Chief Justice or the £170,000 package for the chief of the rail regulator. So then, value for money packages are a must.

    Another essential appendage to any quango is the requirement that it operates within the confines of English law and does not make new law or allow the FOS to do so.

    Finally, we all make errors and those of us who place morality before pride hold up our hands and say sorry.

    My theoretical regulator would do the same, particularly when its behaviour has been unrelentingly perverse or tyrannical.

    Is my design flawed?

    - Alan Lakey is senior partner at Highclere Financial Services